A comprehensive analysis of power, politics, and professional representation in Vanuatu’s education system

---

If you’re a teacher in Vanuatu, a parent concerned about your child’s education, or a policy maker trying to understand why teacher disputes seem to drag on endlessly, you’ve probably wondered: Who actually has the power to make decisions about teachers?

The answer is more complex than you might think.

When teachers go on strike, when salaries are delayed, or when education policies change, multiple organizations are involved – each with different roles, powers, and sometimes conflicting interests. The Teaching Service Commission (TSC), the Vanuatu Teachers Union (VTU), the Ministry of Education (MOE), and ultimately the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers (PM/COM) all play crucial but distinct roles in governing Vanuatu’s 3,000+ teachers.

But here’s where it gets complicated: legal authority doesn’t always translate to real-world power, and political influence can override professional decision-making.

TSC vs VTU Comparison

Aspect	TSC (Teaching Service Commission)	VTU (Vanuatu Teachers Union)
Legal Status	Statutory body established by law	Registered trade union
Mandate	To manage, employ, appoint, discipline, and promote teachers	To represent teachers’ rights, welfare, and interests
Employer Role	Official legal employer of government teachers	Not an employer
Who Signs Contracts	TSC signs teacher employment contracts	VTU does not sign employment contracts
Main Function	Human resource management for teachers in the public system	Advocacy, negotiation, and support for members
Accountability	Accountable to government under Education Act & Public Service	Accountable to union members under its constitution
Authority to Hire or Fire	Yes – has legal authority to appoint, terminate, and discipline	No – can raise concerns or disputes, but not take HR actions
Policy Influence	Can make formal decisions and implement policy	Can lobby and negotiate, but cannot enforce policy
Power in Strikes	Not involved in organizing strikes	Can organize strikes/protests if procedures are followed legally
Funding Source	Government funded	Member contributions (dues) and external support if any
Representation	Acts on behalf of the State	Represents teachers as workers
Nature of Role	Administrative and regulatory	Advocacy and union-based collective bargaining

The comparison table highlighting the key differences between the Teaching Service Commission (TSC) and the Vanuatu Teachers Union (VTU) and it clearly shows how the TSC operates as the government employer with legal authority over teachers, while the VTU functions as the representative body advocating for teachers’ rights and interests. The distinction between their roles – one as employer and the other as advocate – is crucial for understanding the education system’s structure in Vanuatu.

TSC vs VTU Powers and Functions Comparison

Power / Function	TSC (Teaching Service Commission)	VTU (Vanuatu Teachers Union)
Power to Organise a Strike	❌ No – TSC is a government institution and cannot organize or endorse strikes.	✅ Yes – VTU can legally organize strikes, provided it follows proper procedures under the Employment Act (e.g. grievance steps, notice period).
Power to Discipline Strikers	✅ Yes – TSC has the authority to discipline or take administrative action against any teacher who engages in illegal strike action.	❌ No – VTU cannot discipline teachers, but can support them legally or advocate on their behalf.
Power to Negotiate Terms & Conditions	✅ Yes – TSC negotiates on behalf of the government and has the final say on contracts, salaries, postings, promotions.	✅ Limited – VTU can propose, request, and lobby for better conditions, but cannot enforce any change without TSC or Government approval.
Power to Represent Teachers in Disputes	✅ Yes – As the employer, TSC can hear and resolve grievances officially.	✅ Yes – VTU represents teachers’ interests and can take disputes to TSC, courts, or other legal forums.
Power to Sign Agreements (e.g. CBA)	✅ Yes – TSC has legal authority to sign binding agreements.	✅ Yes, conditionally – VTU can sign a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), but only with TSC or government consent.

The powers and functions comparison table showing the different authorities held by the TSC and VTU. This table effectively illustrates the fundamental power dynamics: the TSC holds the administrative and disciplinary authority as the government employer, while the VTU has advocacy and organizing powers as the workers’ representative body. The clear visual indicators (✅ and ❌) make it easy to see where each organization has authority and where they don’t.

TSC vs VTU Payment Authority and Responsibilities

Aspect	TSC (Teaching Service Commission)	VTU (Vanuatu Teachers Union)
Legal Responsibility to Pay	✅ Yes – TSC is the legal employer and has the authority to process and approve payments (e.g. salaries, housing allowance, promotions, etc.)	❌ No – VTU has no legal power to pay claims. It does not control government funds.
Source of Funds	Government budget (Ministry of Education/Finance via TSC)	VTU operates on membership dues and has no access to public funds
Role in Payment Process	TSC processes claims, verifies them, and forwards to the Ministry of Finance for payment	VTU can advocate, lobby, or protest for payments, but cannot release funds
Authority to Approve Claims	✅ Yes – TSC has the mandate to verify, approve, and authorize entitlements for teachers	❌ No – VTU may collect evidence and pressure the employer, but has no approving power
Response to Unpaid Claims	TSC is responsible to investigate, address, or explain delays	VTU may mobilize members, file complaints, or lead strikes to force resolution
Transparency & Accountability	TSC is legally accountable to the government and public for fair disbursement	VTU is accountable to its members for accurate representation, but not for payments

The payment authority and responsibilities comparison table clearly demonstrates the fundamental difference in financial power between the two organizations: the TSC has complete legal authority and responsibility for teacher payments as the government employer, while the VTU’s role is limited to advocacy and pressure tactics. The table effectively shows how the TSC controls the purse strings and is accountable for disbursements, while the VTU can only represent teachers’ interests in seeking payment resolution.

Four-Party Comparison: TSC, VTU, MOE, and PM/COM

Aspect	TSC (Teaching Service Commission)	VTU (Vanuatu Teachers Union)	MOE (Ministry of Education)	PM/COM (Prime Minister / Council of Ministers)
Legal Status	Statutory body established by law	Registered trade union	Executive government department	Executive authority of Government
Employer of Teachers	✅ Yes – Legal employer under Education Act	❌ No – Represents employees	❌ No – Oversees policy and coordination	❌ No – Ultimate policy approver, not the employer
Can Sign a CBA	✅ Yes – Has authority to sign binding CBA	✅ Yes – Can co-sign as employee representative	❌ No – Can provide input, but does not sign	✅/⚠️ Yes, indirectly – May approve final terms before signature
Role in Negotiation	Leads negotiations on behalf of the Government as employer	Leads representation of teachers’ interests	Advises on policy, education standards, budget impact	Provides political direction; final approver of government decisions
Final Authority on Agreements	✅ Legally binding once signed, with MOE and PM input	❌ Must rely on TSC to formalize	⚠️ Influences terms, but not final signer	✅ Yes – Can approve or reject proposal via Council of Ministers
Control of Budget	⚠️ Limited – Recommends to MOE and MFEM	❌ No – Cannot fund anything	✅ Yes – Works with Finance on education budget	✅ Yes – Oversees national budget via COM
Power to Enforce Implementation	✅ Yes – Can direct changes and enforce contract terms	❌ No – Can only advocate or protest non-compliance	⚠️ Can support enforcement by policy instruments	✅ Yes – Can direct national departments or TSC by decision
Can Organise Strike	❌ No – Government institution	✅ Yes – If lawful under the Employment Act	❌ No – Administrative body	❌ No – Political office, not a union
Accountability	To law and government	To union members	To Parliament and Government	To the nation and Parliament

These table reveal the complex multi-layered structure governing teachers in Vanuatu’s education system, involving four key players with distinct but interconnected roles:

The TSC emerges as the operational center – it’s the legal employer with day-to-day authority over teachers’ employment matters, from hiring to contract enforcement. While it leads negotiations and can sign binding agreements, it operates within the broader government framework.

The VTU stands as the sole advocate for teachers’ interests, with unique power to organize strikes and represent workers in negotiations. However, it has no administrative or financial authority and must work through the system to achieve changes for its members.

The MOE functions as the policy coordinator – it influences budget decisions and provides expertise on education standards, but lacks direct employment authority over teachers. It serves as the bridge between operational (TSC) and political (PM/COM) levels.

The PM/COM holds ultimate political authority – while not the direct employer, it has the power to approve or reject major agreements and can direct government departments, including the TSC. It controls the national budget that funds teacher salaries.

---

Generated by AI for clarity of discussion on Social Media and the information does not represent any official legal position of either institution, and readers are encouraged to consult official documents or representatives of TSC and VTU for a more detailed and authoritative explanation of their mandates.

Photo cover by Juan Carlos Temakon